MATCHED EPA CONFIGURATIONS

2026 Ford Escape vs Chevrolet Equinox: EPA energy costs

Compare matched 2026 Ford Escape and Chevrolet Equinox EPA configurations, consumption ranges and five-year energy costs.

Source snapshot 2026-10-05. Matching cohort: Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD · Regular Gasoline · Front-Wheel Drive · . All configurations in this shared cohort are included; other configurations on the source pages are excluded. This is a comparison of this cohort, not the entire nameplates or retail trims.

Same mileage and illustrative energy prices
VehicleEPA combined consumptionCost / mile12,000 mi / year5 years / 60,000 mi
Ford Escape30–30 US MPG$0.12$1,400.00$7,000.00
Chevrolet Equinox27–27 US MPG$0.13$1,555.56$7,777.78

How large is the energy-cost difference?

A minus B ranges from $-155.56 to $-155.56 per year, or $-777.78 to $-777.78 over five years. Positive means A costs more; negative means A costs less. If the range spans zero, the result depends on configuration. These bounds compare every included pairing, without declaring a winner from a best-case trim.

Method and limitations

Annual cost = miles ÷ combined US MPG × fuel price, or miles × kWh/100 mi ÷ 100 × electricity price. Regular/diesel $3.50/gal; premium $4.00/gal; electricity $0.17/kWh. Prices are illustrative, held fixed for five years, not current national averages. EPA wall-energy ratings include charging losses. EPA standardized ratings do not guarantee actual consumption. Costs exclude purchase price, financing, depreciation, insurance, maintenance, taxes and incentives.

Included source records

Compare exact configurations interactively · Source methodology